.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;} <$BlogRSDUrl$>




Ontario Empoblog

Ontario Emperor Blog
("yup, its random!")
This blog has been superseded by the mrontemp blog


Home
Archives

October 2003   November 2003   December 2003   January 2004   February 2004   March 2004   April 2004   May 2004   June 2004   July 2004   August 2004   September 2004   October 2004   November 2004   December 2004   January 2005   February 2005   March 2005   April 2005   May 2005   June 2005   July 2005   August 2005   September 2005   October 2005   November 2005   December 2005   January 2006   February 2006   March 2006   April 2006   May 2006   June 2006   July 2006   August 2006   September 2006   October 2006   November 2006   December 2006   January 2007   February 2007  


The Breast Cancer Site
Fund free mammograms at no cost to yourself by clicking on the link, then on the pink button.


Hall of Shame (NoteUnworthy Blog Posts)
Other Blogs (sorted regionally)
Ontario Emperor Selected del.icio.us Tags

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Listed on BlogShares

;

pkblogs.com


Who Links Here

Click for Ontario, California Forecast

Sunday, December 05, 2004


Moving Left
It's well known that Ronald Reagan started as an FDR liberal, and the neo-conservatives also moved from left to right. But what about the Goldwater Republicans, such as Hillary Clinton, who moved from right to left? Yet another illustration that the red/blue view is overly simplistic:


Book Reviewed By: Mike Schell, Chair of Democratic Rural Conference

Among Democratic partisans, there are a few who, to this day, wonder why in the heck, in their days of youth, they found the candidacy of Barry Goldwater so inspiring and attractive.

How could I in 1964 have been the youth coordinator at Fairport High for Barry Goldwater? I ask myself late at night. Hillary Clinton has told me that she too headed the Goldwater campaign in her high school. Rick Perlstein's Before the Storm gave me an answer in a very readable account of the Goldwater phenomena that is chock full of fascinating anecdotes and historical analysis....

The question remains, why did so many young people, including many who were under the voting age of 21, find Goldwater attractive, only to become Democratic activists later on? After reading Perlstein, it seems the answer lies in the natural instincts of youth itself: freedom, idealism and the need for autonomy. That was the attraction of the Goldwater campaign to many of us in 1964 as we leafed through the pages of "A Conscience of a Conservative," the book ghostwritten for Goldwater as a campaign polemic. (A confession: its length, 127 pages, large type, was what led me to select it for a book report.) Once in the hands of the student, Goldwater's message became a siren song. Struggling through the traditional adolescent's cutting of apron strings, demanding more freedom than adults seemed ready to give them, some teens were ready to hear the conservative call for less strictures on individuals. Keep the government (and Mom, Dad and the campus police) out of our lives.

For a generation that had grown up with air raid drills and fall out shelters, Goldwater's call for personal sacrifice in taking the initiative against the dreaded communists, despite risk of provoking war, "had an almost Ghandian appeal" to the youth of the day, according to Perlstein. It was the same appeal "held by valiant Southern blacks laying their bodies on the line for the freedom to eat where they wished. Freedom was indivisible. It was worth dying for." In short, Perlstein makes the case that the appeal of the Goldwater campaign and conservative principles to young people in 1964 was rooted in the idealism of youth and the natural youthful antipathy toward the establishment....


Comments: Post a Comment


Links to this post:

Create a Link