SEIU vs. Kerry
Well, now that I've blasted the baby seal clubbers, it's time to blast the Marxist murderers. Yes, the Democrats are more united than usual, but unity isn't universal:

SEIU CHIEF NOT THRILLED WITH IDEA OF KERRY VICTORY

DAVID S. BRODER, WASHINGTON POST - Breaking sharply with the enforced harmony of the Democratic National Convention, the president of the largest AFL-CIO union said Monday that both organized labor and the Democratic Party might be better off in the long run if Sen. John F. Kerry loses the election. Andrew Stern, the head of the 1.6 million-member Service Employees International Union....argued that another four years of Bush policies might be less damaging than the stifling of needed reform within the party and the labor movement that he said would occur if Kerry became president. Stern's dissatisfaction with the AFL-CIO and the Democratic Party is not new, but his decision to voice his frustration on the opening day of a carefully scripted convention was an unwelcome surprise to Kerry's convention managers, who had been proclaiming their delight at the absence of any internal conflicts.

Speaking of the effort to create new political and union organizations, Stern said, "I don't know if it would survive with a Democratic president," because Kerry, like former president Bill Clinton, would use the party for his own political benefit and labor leaders would become partners of the new establishment....