Sadly, it fits


In the last millennium, when I was BBS'ing, I was (only) joking (my dear) on Starfish's and Bloose's board and referred to myself as a "fount of all knowledge."

When I was told (after calling the Constitution Party a bunch of Communists) that I have so much knowledge, I was about to reply that I am actually a fount of all knowledge, not just a fount of so much knowledge.

When (after investigating Mideast McDonald's marketing) I was referred to as a wealth of information, I was about to point out that I am actually a fount of all knowledge, not a wealth of information.

Then I found this acronym definition:

FOAK...

Fount of All Knowledge (slang for a know-it-all)


And I just thought that this blog was a tribute to the Beatles' white album.

And a FOAKing good tribute at that.

From the Ontario Empoblog (Latest OVVA news here)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Random Braveman...Random Contest Discoveries With all the hits that he's been getting, it's obvious that Mitzzee and I are not the only ones who have discovered Daily Dancer . Blogpulse and other sources list the following references to Daily Dancer: jrnev.blogspot.com/2005/06/i-might-do-this.html aprilshah.blogspot.com/2005/06/so-much-stuff-so-little-time.html bamapachyderm.com/archives/2005/06/01/omglollmaowtf/ andrightlyso.com/archives/2005/06/01/daily-dancer/ badhairblog.blogspot.com/2005/06/this-is-what-watching-clive-owen.html mickey.ondragonswing.com/archives/006310.html www.tabulas.com/~lainie/877653.html dailydancer.com/plesk-stat/webstat/usage_200506.html showdown.contagiousmedia.org/ The post from Lainie is especially illuminating: Daily Dancer. A computer geek who posts up videos of himself dancing to a different song everyday. This is part of the Contagious Media Showdown awards. Since he needs to get as many visitors per day as possible, I doubt he's reall...
Read more

In which we enter the alternative universe in which police always believe dreadlocked individuals

I previously raised the question about whether Interference Inc. was prompt in letting the authorities know that the so-called bombs in Boston weren't bombs. Now a new question has been raised - was Peter Berdovsky prompt in letting Interference Inc. know that the guerilla marketing campaign had gone sour? And should he have informed the on-scene officers that there was nothing to worry about? The issue was raised because Berdovsky videotaped police at a (supposed) bomb site. This is what the Associated Press said : One of the men criminally charged after placing blinking cartoon advertisements around the city videotaped a police bomb squad removing one of the electronic devices, but did not tell the officers the object was harmless. Surveillance cameras caught 27-year-old Peter Berdovsky videotaping officers removing what they thought was a possible bomb. But Walter Prince , Berdovsky's new layer (replacing semi-guardian Michael Rich ), puts a different spin on the whol...
Read more